How to pronounce gehazi in the bible


I have believed in the Lord for many years and the Bible had the highest and most holy status in my heart. Because it says in the Bible, “For all scriptures, inspired by God, are useful for teaching, for punishment, for improvement, for chastening in righteousness.” (2 Timothy 3:16) For this reason I thought that every word and every sentence in the Bible was inspired by God, so that the Bible was absolutely reliable, flawless, and had the highest authority. So I read it every day and treated it as a holy book and even as God.

However, one day when I was doing the spiritual devotion, some scriptures drew my close attention. When I read 2 Samuel 24: 1 and 1 Chronicles 21: 1, I found that the two verses say David counted people, but their meanings are very different. 2 Samuel 24: 1 says: “And the anger of Jehovah was again kindled against Israel, and he provoked David against them, that he said, Go, count Israel and Judah!” But 1 Chronicles 21: 1 says: “And Satan resisted Israel and provoked David to have Israel numbered. ”One verse says that it was Jehovah God who provoked David to count people, but the other says that Satan provoked David to do so. When I saw this, I suddenly became confused: Why are there different records in the Bible of the same thing in the Bible? Also, there is a huge difference between them. isn't the Bible inspired by God? How could there be mistakes? It couldn't be. I kept studying the scriptures only to find some errors in other verses. For example, 2 Chronicles 36: 9 said: “Jehoiachin was eight years old when he became king. And he reigned three months and ten days in Jerusalem, and did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD. ”It says that Jehoiachin was king when he was eight years old, and he reigned three months and ten days; while 2 Kings 24: 8 says he was eighteen years old when he began to reign, and he reigned for three months. Also, the words the Lord Jesus said to Peter in the New Testament are different. Luke 22:61 said, “Before the rooster crows, you will deny me three times.” But Mark 14:72 said, “Before the rooster crows twice, you will deny me three times.” There is another example. In Matthew 27: 5 Judas hanged himself, but in Acts 1:18 he died, fell and fell in half. It is clear from these verses that the content of the record is imprecise. How can there be mistakes in the Bible? How could that be? The Bible is inspired by God! I was really confused: Could it be that the Bible wasn't inspired by the Holy Spirit? At that time I was lost in deeper thoughts. I remembered the years when I believed in the Lord. I always thought that the Bible was inspired by God. I held up the Bible above everything else, and I even considered it a heavenly book and a holy book. If I hadn't seen these for myself by studying the Bible, I would not have believed today that there are so many mistakes. What's happening? In confusion, I could only pray to God: “Oh Lord, isn't the Bible inspired by the Holy Spirit? Isn't everything written by the Holy Spirit? How can there be so many mistakes? Oh lord I'm really confused about this. May you guide me to understand why. "

One morning while reading the scriptures, a verse caught my attention. It says: “When many have undertaken to report the stories that have gone on among us, as have given us, who have seen it from the beginning and have been servants of the word: I also considered it good after I have explored everything from the beginning with diligence, so that I will write it to you, my good Theophilus, so that you will know the doctrine in which you are instructed. ”(Luke 1: 1-4) When I saw this verse , I was really amazed. I read these verses over and over again, “When many have undergone report of the stories that have gone on among us, as have given us, who have seen it from the beginning and been servants of the word.” I suddenly understood : These letters were recorded from the words of the preachers, not the personal experiences of the authors. So then there are many errors in the Bible. The authors wrote the letters based on what they saw and heard, and based on their own understanding and knowledge. How can this represent God's inspiration? If all the scriptures really come from the inspiration of God, just like the prophecies of the prophets and revelation, how can there be errors? Thanks for the Lord's guidance! I realized that not all scriptures are inspired by God. For example, the four gospels were written from what the disciples saw and heard, not direct inspiration from God. The Acts of the Apostles records the biographies of the Lord Jesus' disciples who preached God's Word, he is not inspired by God. I understood that most of the scriptures in the Bible were written by people who, according to their personal memories and the sermons of others, followed God to write down what they saw and heard during God's work. Hence, it is not surprising that there are flaws and that it is mixed up with human will.

This problem made me feel depressed. For many years I had believed in the Lord, I never heard anyone in the entire religious world say the fact that there are errors in the Bible. Now I saw this with my eyes, but I couldn't be entirely sure about that. So I kept searching and often praying to God and asking Him to guide me to find more evidence so that I could understand it clearly. Then I looked in another spiritual book and read a section, "Today people believe that the Bible is God and that God is the Bible. So they also believe that all of the words in the Bible are the only words God has ever spoken and that they were all said by God. In fact, although all of the sixty-six books of the Old and New Testaments were written by humans, believers think that they were all inspired by God and that they are records of the manifestations of the Holy Spirit. That is the wrong understanding of human beings and does not exactly correspond to the facts. In fact, with the exception of the Books of Prophecy, the Old Testament is largely historical. Some of the New Testament epistles were created through human experience, and some were created through the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit; for example, the letters of Paul are human work and all resulted from the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit. They were written for the churches and were words of exhortation and encouragement to the brothers and sisters of the churches. They weren't words the Holy Spirit spoke - Paul couldn't speak in the name of the Holy Spirit, nor was he a prophet, and even less did he see the visions John saw. His epistles were written for the congregations of Ephesus, Philadelphia, Galatia, and other churches. Thus the Pauline letters of the New Testament are epistles that Paul wrote for the churches and they are neither inspirations of the Holy Spirit nor direct manifestations of the Holy Spirit. They are just words of exhortation, consolation, and encouragement that he wrote down for the churches in the course of his ministry. So they are also many records of Paul's work at that time. ... Everything he said that was uplifting and positive to people was correct, but it did not represent the manifestations of the Holy Spirit and it could not represent God. It is an outrageous understanding and tremendous blasphemy that people should regard the records of human experiences and man's epistles as the words spoken by the Holy Spirit to the churches! ”“ If the four Gospels all came from the Holy Spirit, then why did Matthew have , Mark, Luke and John said different things about the work of Jesus? If you don't believe this, look at the Bible record of how Peter denied the Lord three times: They are all different and they all have their own characteristics. ... Read the four Gospels carefully; read the records of the things Jesus did and the words He spoke. Each recording was quite simply different and each had its own perspective. If everything the authors wrote in these books came from the Holy Spirit, everything should be equal and in agreement. Then why are there differences? Isn't a person extremely foolish that he cannot see this?“From these words I understood that part of the Bible came from the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit, but most of it came from human records. In addition, since each person had their own experience and understanding, their education and caliber were different, and what they recorded was different and the mistakes were inevitable. For example, the four Gospels were all the record of the Lord Jesus' work, but Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John each recorded differently, each with their own characteristics. So the four gospels recorded by man should not all have been inspired by God. In addition, the letters of Paul, Peter, John and others are drawn from the works and experiences of man. Because of their burden to the churches, they wrote letters to exhort and encourage the brothers and sisters of the churches. Although the letters were edifying and helpful to people, we cannot treat them as words of the Holy Spirit. Only then was I really sure that not all scriptures were inspired by God. From this I knew that my understanding in the past was too wrong.

Afterwards I read a paragraph from this spiritual book, "The Bible is a historical record of God's work in Israel and documents many of the prophecies of ancient prophets as well as some of Jehovah's statements about His work at that time. This is why this book is considered holy by all people (since God is holy and great). All of this, of course, is the result of their reverence for Jehovah and their worship of God. People only call this book that because the creations of God venerate and worship their Creator so much; there are even those who call this book a heavenly book. In fact, it is just a human record. It was not personally named by Jehovah, nor did Jehovah personally guide its creation. In other words, it was not God who wrote this book, but man. Scripture is just the respectful title man has given it. Jehovah and Jesus did not choose this title after a mutual discussion; it is nothing more than a human idea. For this book was not written by Jehovah, much less by Jesus. Instead, it is a collection of accounts from numerous ancient prophets, apostles, and seers, which later generations have compiled into a book of ancient scriptures that people believe to be particularly sacred, a book that many believe are unfathomable and holds profound secrets just waiting to be deciphered by future generations. Accordingly, people are far more inclined to believe that this book is a heavenly book. With the addition of the Four Gospels and the Book of Revelation, man's attitude towards him differs in a special way from that of any other book, and thus no one dares to dissect 'the heavenly book' because it is too 'holy '.“From these words I was more certain that the author of the Bible is not God but man; In other words, it was not recorded directly by Jehovah God, let alone the Lord Jesus, but by these prophets, apostles, and seers. The Bible is just the respectful title later generations give them, not out of God's will. It's just that we consider the Bible too "holy" and even treat the Bible as a heavenly book.

I remember the past, the reason I adored the Bible very much was only because I did not know the inner history of the Bible, and in my heart I treated it as a heavenly book and a holy book. By searching, I finally had an understanding of the inner history of the Bible and how to properly treat it. In the Bible, the words of Jehovah and the Lord Jesus, the prophecies of Revelation, and the words of God conveyed by prophets - all of these are the words of God. With a heart that worships God, we should treat these words carefully and not be disrespectful to them; moreover, we should treat them as an important part of the equipment at ordinary times. Regarding the other words such as the historical records, the letters of the apostles, the psalms and the Proverbs, although some of them came from the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit, they were not inspired by God. So we should treat them right. We cannot blindly worship them or treat the words of man in the Bible as God's words, much less use the Bible as a substitute for God's place in our hearts. Believing in God we should not blindly worship the Bible, nor should we think that belief in the Bible is belief in God. Of course, we cannot despise or deny it just because of a little human will or the mistakes. Although there are errors in human records, the work that God has done is always true. The value of the Bible is that it is the testimony and record of the first two stages of God's work. From the Bible we can know the manifestations and deeds of God, and have knowledge of the almighty wisdom with which He created everything and rules over everything, and it is very helpful for us to know God, follow God and worship God. But the words and work of God recorded in the Bible contain only a very limited portion, not all of his words and work. Most notably, the words of Revelation that God inspired John to do during His work in the latter days, which is not recorded in the Bible. In order to hear the voice of God in the last days, we should seek God's work and words outside of the Bible instead of confining His work and words to the Bible. If we get the Bible right, we will be doing God's will because we believe in God, not the Bible. Only God is the truth and the ever flowing source of the living water of life. Only by following in the footsteps of the Lamb can we receive God's promise.

Thank you for leading God, I have a new understanding of the Bible and I understand that the Bible is not entirely inspired by God. Besides, it is only a bridge that helps us to know the work of Jehovah God and Lord Jesus. The Bible cannot be compared to God, nor can it be treated as God. Otherwise it will be a great blasphemy. Thank the Lord for letting me get out of sight and know how to properly treat the Bible! All the glory be to God!

Recommended for you: